Is Enscape 4.0 better than Lumion 2024?

Enscape 4.0 is better than Lumion for working in real-time on interior or up to medium-sized architectural projects; it allows real-time preview results without exiting the application. Based on our tests, Lumion 2024 produces more photo-realistic images compared to Enscape 4.0, but updating files in real-time takes time and effort.

Enscape excels in speed and ease of use with seamless integration with popular CAD software as Revit, SketchUp, Rhino, ArchiCAD, and Vectorworks, making it ideal for fast design iterations and real-time VR walkthroughs. Enscape often ends up being more affordable than Lumion, especially with its monthly subscription option. Enscape has good built-in virtual reality walk-through support. The downside of Enscape’s focus on speed and simplicity is that you have less fine-grained control over the rendering process compared to Lumion. Enscape’s library of materials, objects, etc., is generally smaller than Lumion’s.

Lumion, on the other hand, offers high-quality visuals and extensive customization, perfect for crafting stunning final renders. Lumion offers a massive library of objects, textures, and effects for detailed scenes. You get granular control over lighting, weather effects, and other aspects for polished results and an excellent toolset for creating animations and videos.

As a negative Lumion isn’t as immediately intuitive as Enscape and may take longer to master. Lumion generally has a higher price tag than Enscape. Lumion does not offer real-time sync and changes in your CAD model aren’t instantly updated in Lumion, requiring you to re-import the model for each change.

In our opinion, if you’re new to architectural visualization, Enscape is friendlier and budget-friendly.

If you want final renders that are stunning, then Lumion’s power will be worth it.

Picture of George Nicola
George Nicola

George is a seasoned interior designer and property marketing strategist with over 13 years of experience. He specializes in transforming properties into visually stunning spaces, helping clients recognize the potential and beauty in each property. With an impressive international client base of exciting projects throughout Europe and America.

TL;DR Comparing Enscape to Lumion

Enscape and Lumion are two of the most popular real-time software programs for creating architectural visualizations. 

Both programs offer a range of features that allow architects and designers to create stunning 3D models, renderings, and animations. 

However, which one is better, Enscape or Lumion? This is a question that many newbies getting into the architectural visualization industry have been asking.

Enscape and Lumion are both powerful software programs that offer a range of features that make it easy to create high-quality architectural visualizations. Each program has its own strengths and weaknesses.

A close-up view of a textured blue rug with a section of a wooden stool and a stone table visible at the edges, rendered using architectural visualization software.
A close-up view of a textured blue rug with a section of a wooden stool and a stone table visible at the edges, rendered using architectural visualization software Enscape 4.0

TL;DR Comparing Enscape to Lumion

Enscape and Lumion are two of the most popular real-time software programs for creating architectural visualizations. 

Both programs offer a range of features that allow architects and designers to create stunning 3D models, renderings, and animations. 

However, which one is better, Enscape or Lumion? This is a question that many newbies getting into the architectural visualization industry have been asking.

Enscape and Lumion are both powerful software programs that offer a range of features that make it easy to create high-quality architectural visualizations. Each program has its own strengths and weaknesses.

Performance – Which software renders faster and can handle larger models more efficiently? Lumion is known to be more resource-intensive and requires a powerful computer, while Enscape may be more optimized.

Price – Enscape has a lower entry price point, with monthly and annual subscription options. Lumion only offers an annual license which is more expensive upfront.

Ease of use – Both have intuitive interfaces, but Enscape is a plugin that integrates directly into modeling programs which may make the workflow simpler. Lumion is a standalone program.

Render quality—Render quality is subjective based on what is the end goal of the project, but in general, both can produce high-quality, realistic renders. Lumion may have an edge for exteriors and landscapes, while Enscape excels at interiors and fast real-time rendering.

Features – Lumion has a wider range of visual effects, assets, and scene building tools. Enscape focuses on essential features and fast real-time visualization.

In this article, we will compare Enscape and Lumion to help you decide which one is better for your needs. 

We will look at the features of each program, their ease of use, their rendering capabilities, and their pricing to help you make an informed decision. Whether you are an architect, interior designer, 3D artist, or just starting out, this article will provide you with the information you need to choose the right software for your next project.

Who uses Enscape and Lumion?

A modern living room featuring a soft brown sofa with textured pillows and a glass coffee table supporting a glowing spherical lamp, rendered using Lumion.
A modern living room featuring a soft brown sofa with textured pillows and a glass coffee table supporting a glowing spherical lamp, rendered using Lumion.

When it comes to interior visualization projects, both Enscape and Lumion have their strengths, but Enscape have the edge due to its seamless integration with popular CAD software used for interior design.

Enscape’s advantages for interior projects:

  1. Real-time rendering within CAD software: Enscape allows users to create and visualize interior designs directly within their preferred modeling programs, such as SketchUp, Revit, or Rhinoceros. This seamless integration enables faster iterations and real-time feedback during the design process.
  2. Faster workflow: Enscape’s real-time rendering and user-friendly interface can lead to a more efficient workflow, allowing interior designers to quickly test different materials, lighting, and furniture layouts.
  3. Realistic lighting and materials: Enscape provides high-quality, realistic rendering of interior spaces, with accurate lighting simulation and a library of customizable materials to create visually appealing and lifelike interior visualizations.
  4. VR capabilities: Enscape’s virtual reality features enable interior designers to create immersive experiences, allowing clients to explore and interact with the designed spaces as if they were actually there.

Lumion’s strengths for interior projects:

  1. High-quality final renders: Lumion is known for producing stunningly photorealistic images and videos, which can be valuable for presenting final interior designs to clients or for marketing purposes.
  2. Extensive asset library: Lumion offers a vast collection of high-quality 3D models, including furniture, accessories, and decor elements, which can be easily incorporated into interior scenes to add realism and detail.
  3. Lighting and effects: Lumion provides a wide range of lighting options and effects, such as soft shadows, reflections, and global illumination, to enhance the visual appeal of interior spaces.

For architectural student projects, Enscape is the better choice due to its ease of use, seamless integration with popular modeling software, and affordability.

Reasons why Enscape is well-suited for architectural students:

  1. Easy learning curve: Enscape is designed to be user-friendly and intuitive, making it easier for students to learn and adapt to the software quickly. This allows them to focus more on their design process and less on the technical aspects of the rendering software.
  2. Integration with familiar modeling programs: Enscape integrates seamlessly with SketchUp, Revit, ArchiCAD, Rhino, and Vectorworks, which are widely used in architectural education. This integration allows students to work within the modeling software they are already comfortable with, minimizing the need to learn an entirely new interface.
  3. Real-time visualization: Enscape’s real-time rendering capabilities enable students to instantly visualize their designs and make changes on the fly. This feature is particularly valuable for students as it encourages experimentation, iteration, and rapid feedback throughout the design process.
  4. Affordable pricing: Enscape offers a more affordable pricing model compared to Lumion, with monthly and annual subscription options. This makes it more accessible for students who may have limited budgets or only need the software for a short period, such as the duration of a specific project or academic term.
  5. Focused feature set: Enscape provides a streamlined set of features that are well-suited for architectural visualization. This focused approach can be beneficial for students, as it allows them to concentrate on the essential aspects of rendering without being overwhelmed by a vast array of complex settings and options.

For architectural student projects, Enscape is the better choice due to its ease of use, seamless integration with popular modeling software, and affordability.

Reasons why Enscape is well-suited for architectural students:

  1. Easy learning curve: Enscape is designed to be user-friendly and intuitive, making it easier for students to learn and adapt to the software quickly. This allows them to focus more on their design process and less on the technical aspects of the rendering software.
  2. Integration with familiar modeling programs: Enscape integrates seamlessly with SketchUp, Revit, ArchiCAD, Rhino, and Vectorworks, which are widely used in architectural education. This integration allows students to work within the modeling software they are already comfortable with, minimizing the need to learn an entirely new interface.
  3. Real-time visualization: Enscape’s real-time rendering capabilities enable students to instantly visualize their designs and make changes on the fly. This feature is particularly valuable for students as it encourages experimentation, iteration, and rapid feedback throughout the design process.
  4. Affordable pricing: Enscape offers a more affordable pricing model compared to Lumion, with monthly and annual subscription options. This makes it more accessible for students who may have limited budgets or only need the software for a short period, such as the duration of a specific project or academic term.
  5. Focused feature set: Enscape provides a streamlined set of features that are well-suited for architectural visualization. This focused approach can be beneficial for students, as it allows them to concentrate on the essential aspects of rendering without being overwhelmed by a vast array of complex settings and options.

For home DIY projects, both Enscape and Lumion are more advanced and more complex than necessary. However, if you are a DIY enthusiast with experience in 3D modeling and a desire to create high-quality visualizations of your home renovation or design projects, Enscape could be the better choice for the following reasons:

  1. Integration with SketchUp: SketchUp is a popular and user-friendly 3D modeling software that many DIY enthusiasts use for their projects. Enscape integrates seamlessly with SketchUp, allowing you to create renderings and visualizations directly within the SketchUp interface.
  2. Ease of use: Compared to Lumion, Enscape has a gentler learning curve and a more straightforward interface, making it easier for non-professionals to learn and use effectively.
  3. Real-time rendering: Enscape’s real-time rendering capabilities enable you to see the changes you make to your design instantly, which can be helpful when experimenting with different materials, colors, and layouts in your DIY projects.
  4. Lower cost: Enscape offers more affordable pricing options compared to Lumion, with monthly and annual subscription plans. This can be more budget-friendly for DIY projects.

That being said, there are other software options that might be more suitable and cost-effective for home DIY projects, such as:

  1. SketchUp Free or SketchUp Pro: SketchUp itself is a powerful tool for 3D modeling and basic rendering, and it may be sufficient for many DIY projects without the need for additional rendering software.
  2. Floorplanner: This is a web-based tool that allows users to create 2D and 3D floor plans, and it offers a more straightforward and affordable solution for DIY home design projects.
  3. Planner 5D: Another user-friendly web-based tool that enables users to create floor plans, interior designs, and 3D visualizations for their home projects.

Budget-conscious professionals or firms of architects and designers focused on rapid design iterations and client presentations use Enscape because of its seamless integration within their existing CAD software (Revit, SketchUp, Rhino, etc.).

Enscape is great for Real-time visualization for quick feedback during the design process. Creating walkthroughs and VR experiences for client presentations with less than 10 clicks teams can generate marketing materials (still renderings, fly-through animations).

Lumion is used by professionals creating high-end marketing materials or cinematic presentations or visualization specialists needing maximum control for hyper-realistic results. Lumion is capable to handle large landscape visualization projects with up to 10 million polygons or more but with a very good hardware.

Overview of Enscape and Lumion

Enscape: Enscape is designed to be intuitive and easy to learn, especially for users already familiar with the modeling software it integrates with (SketchUp, Revit, ArchiCAD, Rhino, or Vectorworks). Many users report being able to create basic renderings within a 4 hours of starting to use Enscape. The software’s real-time rendering capabilities and simplified settings make it easier for new users to achieve good results quickly. However, mastering advanced features and techniques may take some additional time up to 3-5 weeks.

Lumion: As with Enscape, users can often create simple renderings within a 2 to 4 hours of starting to use Lumion. Lumion’s interface is designed to be user-friendly, and the software comes with an extensive library of pre-built materials, objects, and effects that can be easily applied to imported models.  The software’s real-time navigation and intuitive controls make it easy for users to explore and experiment with different settings and options. However, achieving highly photorealistic results and mastering advanced features may require 4 to 6 weeks.

The typical workflows for rendering in Enscape and Lumion share some similarities but also have distinct differences. Here’s a general overview of the workflow for each software:

Enscape Workflow:

  1. Create a 3D model in a supported modeling software (SketchUp, Revit, ArchiCAD, Rhino, or Vectorworks).
  2. Install the Enscape plugin in the modeling software.
  3. With the 3D model open, start Enscape from within the modeling software.
  4. Enscape will synchronize with the model, allowing you to make changes and see real-time updates in the Enscape rendering window.
  5. Apply materials, lighting, and other visual settings using Enscape’s interface.
  6. Add Enscape assets, such as people, vegetation, or furniture, to enhance the scene.
  7. Set up cameras and create still images, panoramas, or real-time walkthroughs.
  8. Adjust rendering settings and export high-quality images, videos, or VR experiences.

Lumion Workflow:

  1. Create a 3D model in a supported modeling software (SketchUp, Revit, AutoCAD, 3ds Max, etc.).
  2. Export the model in a compatible format, such as FBX or DAE.
  3. Import the model into Lumion.
  4. Lumion will load the model, and you can navigate the scene in real-time.
  5. Apply materials, lighting, and effects using Lumion’s library and tools.
  6. Add Lumion assets, such as landscapes, people, or objects, to enhance the scene.
  7. Set up cameras and create still images, animations, or 360-degree panoramas.
  8. Adjust rendering settings and export high-quality images or videos.

The main difference between the two workflows is that Enscape works as a plugin within the modeling software, allowing for real-time synchronization and updates. This enables a more seamless and iterative design process, as changes made in the modeling software are instantly reflected in Enscape.

Lumion, on the other hand, is a standalone application. Models need to be exported from the modeling software and imported into Lumion. While this process allows for more control over the final visualization, it may require more manual effort to update the model if changes are made in the original modeling software.

Both workflows ultimately lead to high-quality renderings and visualizations, but the choice between Enscape and Lumion depends on the user’s preferences, software familiarity, and project requirements.

Enscape 4.0

Enscape 4.0 is a compelling choice for architects seeking a fast, user-friendly archviz workflow, especially if VR is a priority. But the “best” option depends on the user’s specific needs in terms of visual style, complexity, asset requirements, and budget. Enscape, Twinmotion, and Lumion are the leaders for ease of use, while Corona, V-Ray and Unreal offer more advanced customization and power at the cost of simplicity.

Chaos Enscape 4.0 is a powerful real-time rendering and visualization plugin that integrates seamlessly with popular CAD and BIM software like ArchiCAD, Rhino, Revit, SketchUp, Vectorworks. It provides a unified, high-performance experience across both Windows and macOS platforms.

Real-time rendering – Enscape provides instant, high-quality real-time visualization that updates live as you design, allowing you to explore and present ideas on the fly.

Asset library – Enscape offers a library of over 3,000 assets, including a collection of customizable 3D models to quickly add realism to scenes. However, some competitors like Twinmotion have even larger asset libraries.

Ease of use – As a CAD-integrated plugin, Enscape has a shallow learning curve and simple workflow compared to complex standalone rendering engines, making it accessible to more users.

Virtual reality – Enscape excels at providing immersive VR experiences to better communicate designs to clients. Version 4.0 added support for new VR headsets like Meta Quest 3.

Lighting and reflections – Enscape 4.0 introduced improved global illumination, ray-traced artificial lighting, and enhanced reflections for even greater realism.

Output options – Enscape supports exporting still images, panoramas, videos, and standalone web presentations from your CAD model to tailor client presentations.

Chaos ecosystem – Enscape’s acquisition by Chaos Group enables interoperability with other Chaos products like V-Ray to expand capabilities and assets available.

While Enscape has an edge in ease of use and VR, some competitors offer advantages in other areas:

  • Twinmotion has a larger asset library and Quixel Megascans access.
  • Lumion is known for animated assets and fine detail.
  • Corona and Unreal provide more advanced features but steeper learning curves.

Lumion 2024

 Lumion 2024 remains one of the most popular and powerful archviz tools, especially for users who prioritize exceptional rendering quality and an intuitive, streamlined workflow. The latest ray tracing, denoising, and asset library upgrades in Lumion 2024 help cement its position as an industry leader for crafting compelling, photorealistic architectural visualizations.

Lumion 2024 is a powerful 3D rendering and visualization software that enables architects and designers to create stunning, photorealistic images and videos. Some of the key new features and advantages of Lumion 2024 include:

Ray tracing enhancements – Lumion 2024 significantly improves the realism of renders with ray-traced subsurface scattering for translucent materials, and ray tracing support for fine-detail nature items like trees and plants.

Real-time denoising – A new real-time denoiser provides a cleaner, smoother preview while also reducing the number of samples needed for high-quality movie renders, boosting both efficiency and quality.

Expanded asset library – The Lumion Library now contains over 9,400 assets including 100+ new fine-detail nature items, 45 new characters, 26 materials, 130 surface decals, and 25 new parallax interior options for added realism and storytelling.

Workflow improvements – Lumion 2024 introduces camera control presets to match popular CAD tools, batch model importing, gLTF file support, and a redesigned vertical UI sidebar to streamline workflow.

New creative options – Users can explore 8 new preset render styles, a new example project, and helpful grid overlay guides to quickly achieve beautiful, balanced results.

Compared to other popular archviz software:

  • Enscape focuses more on real-time visualization and VR, while Lumion prioritizes photo realistic image and video rendering with an expansive content library.
  • D5 Render is praised for its real-time ray tracing and multi-software compatibility, but Lumion’s ease of use and larger asset library still stands out.
  • Twinmotion boasts a larger asset library with Quixel Megascans and an intuitive UI, but Lumion’s rendering quality, effects, and overall ease of use are often cited as superior.

Enscape vs Lumion Hardware Requirements

Both Enscape and Lumion have fairly high system requirements, especially for the graphics card. While you can still run Lumion and Enscape on a mid-budget laptop for $1200, such as MSI Cyborg 15 or HP Victus 15, for optimal performance, prefer that MSI Katana 15, MSI 2023 CYBORG 15.6 or ASUS ROG Strix G16 are best for running both types of real-time visualization software.

Lumion tends to have somewhat higher CPU and RAM requirements compared to Enscape. For Enscape: A high-end NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and above or AMD Radeon RX graphics card with at least 6-8 GB of VRAM, 32-64 GB of system RAM, and a modern 8-core CPU is recommended for the best performance in either program.

For Lumion: a GPU scoring a G3DMark of 8,000 or higher with up-to-date drivers (such as NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 or better). 6 GB or more of graphics card memory is required.

Graphics Card and System Requirements
RequirementEnscapeLumion
Graphics Card (GPU)NVIDIA or AMD dedicated GPU, 4GB+ VRAM, supports Vulkan 1.1 (GTX 900 series / Quadro M / RX 400 or newer)G3DMark of 8,000+, 6GB+ VRAM (GTX 1060 or better)
CPU (Processor)No specific requirements, Enscape primarily relies on the GPUSingle thread CPUMark of 2,200+ (Ryzen 5 1600X, i7-4790S or better)
System Memory (RAM)16 GB+ recommended16 GB+ required, 64 GB+ recommended
Operating SystemWindows 10 or higherUp-to-date Windows 10 64-bit (version 2004 or newer)
StorageNot specifiedMinimum 105 GB free on SSD or HDD
VR RequirementsMinimum 8GB VRAMVR not currently a focus

Enscape vs Lumion Rendering Capabilities

Both Enscape and Lumion deliver excellent, high-quality rendering. Enscape is better for real-time visualization and rendering very complex scenes, while Lumion produces the most photorealistic final renders with more effects and options. The choice depends on your priorities and workflow – Enscape for faster real-time feedback while designing, or Lumion for the absolute best quality final output.

Rendering Quality

Enscape 2024:

  • Enscape excels at providing high-quality, realistic, real-time rendering that updates live as you design in your CAD software, including with Rhino 8.3+ for real-time visualization within your Rhino workflow.
  • It can handle rendering very complex models in real-time.
  • Enscape focuses on rendering quality and efficiency. The latest versions have improved global illumination, ray-traced lighting, and enhanced reflections for greater realism. The ray traced artificial lighting works on Windows OS only, and produces accurate shadows and crisp light variations, especially with large light sources creating soft shadows.
  • Updated GPU denoiser which improves the realism and quality of renders, especially in low-light interior scenes or scenes with reflective surfaces.
  • MAC OS: Mac users finally have full feature parity with Windows OS versions.

Lumion:

  • Lumion is known for producing high-quality, photorealistic renders and animations.
  • The rendering quality has improved significantly with each new version, especially for interior scenes.
  • Lumion offers a wide range of visual effects like realistic lighting, weather conditions, and night scenes for both interiors and exteriors.
  • Ray Tracing Quality Presets: Choose from fast, balanced, high, etc. for quick settings instead of manual tweaking.
  • Ray Traced Glass: Enhanced detail, colored shadows, and properties like distortion and thickness for hyper-realistic glass.
  • Landscape Tiling: Seamless, non-repetitive texturing for natural-looking landscapes. Found in material UV settings.
    Ray Traced Trees: Vastly improved realism and light interaction for thousands of tree models, especially noticeable when compared to Lumion 2023.
    Real-time Ray Tracing Previews: New denoiser provides clear real-time previews while adjusting settings. Less noise, and no need to reload preview with each change.
  • Parallax Interiors: Single-polygon objects that simulate fully detailed rooms. Great for adding life to buildings on your site without time-consuming object placement also it improves the performance – much lighter than modeling full interiors.
  • GLTF support, which makes the overall scene file up to 10 times smaller for the same amount of polygons and edges.

Enscape vs Lumion Costs

When it comes to value for money, Enscape is the clear winner. Enscape offers a more affordable pricing model and provides users with all the necessary features to create high-quality 3D renders. Enscape is also easier to use than Lumion, making it a perfect choice for beginners.

Lumion, on the other hand, offers more features than Enscape, making it a better choice for advanced users. However, Lumion’s pricing model may be a bit expensive for some users. Users should carefully evaluate their needs and budget before deciding which software to use.

Enscape is 1.72 times cheaper (approximately 42% less expensive) than Lumion Standard and 3.46 times cheaper (approximately 71% less expensive) compared to Lumion Pro.

Enscape offers a simple pricing model. It is available for $39 per month or $468 per year. Before purchasing a license, users can test the software’s functionality for free for 14 days by downloading a trial version.

Enscape offers a single license that can be used on multiple machines. The software is available in six languages and is used by architects, designers, urban planners, and visualization professionals who require real-time 3D rendering software for their projects.

On the other hand, Lumion offers two pricing models. The Lumion Standard costs €62.42/month and €749/year, while the Lumion Pro costs €124.92/month and €1,499/year. Lumion also offers a free trial version. Lumion’s pricing model may be a bit expensive for some users, but it offers more features than Enscape.

Final Veridict

Enscape is best suited for those who value speed, efficiency, and ease of use in their design workflow, while Lumion is ideal for professionals who require the utmost in visual quality and have the budget and hardware to support it. 

Both software packages offer unique strengths and cater to different needs within the architectural visualization industry.

Can you model in Lumion or Enscape?

Both Enscape and Lumion are not primarily designed for 3D modeling. They are visualization tools that work best when used in conjunction with dedicated 3D modeling software. Users typically create their 3D models in programs like SketchUp, Revit, or Rhino, and then import them into Enscape or Lumion for rendering and visualization purposes.

Who does Lumion and Enscape compare to Unreal Engine 5?

Unreal Engine 5 (UE5) is a powerful game engine and 3D creation tool that has been gaining popularity in the field of architectural visualization. Unreal Engine 5 offers more advanced features, higher visual fidelity, and greater versatility compared to both Enscape and Lumion. The downside is it also comes with a steeper learning curve and requires more technical expertise.

While Enscape and Lumion primarily focus on architectural rendering and visualization, Unreal Engine 5 offers a more comprehensive and versatile platform for creating interactive experiences, animations, and high-quality visuals.

UE 5 comparison with Enscape:

  1. Real-time rendering: Both Enscape and Unreal Engine 5 offer real-time rendering capabilities, allowing users to see changes instantly as they modify their scenes.
  2. Ease of use: Enscape is generally considered easier to learn and use than Unreal Engine 5, especially for those already familiar with CAD software like SketchUp or Revit. Unreal Engine 5 has a steeper learning curve and requires more technical knowledge.
  3. Integration: Enscape integrates seamlessly with popular CAD software, while Unreal Engine 5 requires users to import their models and set up scenes within the engine itself.
  4. Photorealism: While Enscape produces high-quality, realistic renderings, Unreal Engine 5 is capable of creating even more photorealistic visuals with advanced features like Lumen (dynamic global illumination) and Nanite (high-detail geometry rendering).
  5. Interactivity: Unreal Engine 5 offers more advanced interactive features, such as real-time walkthroughs and the ability to create fully interactive experiences, whereas Enscape focuses primarily on static renderings and basic walkthroughs.

UE 5 comparison with Lumion:

  1. Photorealism: Both Lumion and Unreal Engine 5 are capable of producing highly photorealistic visuals. However, Unreal Engine 5’s advanced features like Lumen and Nanite give it an edge in terms of visual fidelity and realism.
  2. Ease of use: Lumion is generally considered easier to learn and use compared to Unreal Engine 5, with a more intuitive interface and a larger library of pre-made assets and effects.
  3. Workflow: Lumion is designed specifically for architectural visualization, offering a streamlined workflow for importing models, applying materials, and creating animations. Unreal Engine 5 is more versatile but requires more setup and technical knowledge.
  4. Interactivity: Unreal Engine 5 offers more advanced interactive features and the ability to create fully interactive experiences, while Lumion focuses primarily on creating high-quality static renderings and animations.
  5. Rendering speed: Lumion is known for its fast rendering speeds, while Unreal Engine 5 may require more optimization and hardware resources to achieve similar performance.